Management Of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Research Articles

Effectiveness & safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse

Effectiveness & safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse

Complications of obliterative versus reconstructive vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in octogenarians: A retrospective cohort study.

Women of advanced age may choose between restorative or obliterative surgery for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obliterative surgery is traditionally reserved for a subset of older women with more severe medical comorbidities, since obliterative approaches are generally considered to be less morbid and older individuals have higher rates of perioperative complications than younger cohorts. This study compared perioperative complications amongst octogenarians undergoing obliterative versus reconstructive approaches. This data will help to inform perioperative counselling as previous studies have not been powered to evaluate complications in this population. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients that had Pelvic organ prolapse surgery between 2012 and 2021, aged 80 years or older. Single-compartment procedures, vaginal mesh procedures, and oncologic surgery were excluded. The primary outcome was any complication within the first 30 days excluding urinary tract infection (UTI). UTI, readmission, and severe complications were secondary outcomes. Of the 4149 patients identified, 2514 (60.6%) underwent reconstructive surgery and 1635 (39.4%) underwent obliterative surgery. Patients undergoing reconstructive surgery were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2 (46.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.002) and were less likely to be on antihypertensive medication (72.0% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.006). Further, there was an increased length of stay (1.47 ± 1.84 vs. 1.03 ± 1.31 days, p < 0.001) in hospital for reconstructive surgery which was more often performed as an inpatient (45.7% vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the primary outcome: any complication excluding UTIs. However, UTI was more common in the reconstructive group (aOR 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.0). The rate of serious complications (Clavien-Dindo Class IV) was low overall and not different between reconstructive and obliterative approaches (1.3% vs. 1.0%, respectively). Both vaginal reconstructive and obliterative approaches have low complication rates in octogenarians, with only UTIrate being different between cohorts. When choosing surgical approach, we suggest a case-based, patient center discussion on the anatomic outcomes, durability and patient satisfaction.

Implication of Neighborhood Deprivation Index on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management.

Differences in the rate of diagnosis of POP have been described based on race and ethnicity; however, there are few data available on the management and treatment patterns of POP based on multiple factors of socioeconomic status and deprivation. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) management and the Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), a standardized multidimensional measure of socioeconomic status. This retrospective cohort study included female members of a large integrated health care delivery system who were 18 years or older and had ≥4 years of continuous health care membership from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Demographic, POP diagnosis, urogynecology consultation, and surgical treatment of POP were obtained from the electronic medical record. Neighborhood Deprivation Index data were extrapolated via zip code and were reported in quartiles, with higher quartiles reflecting greater deprivation. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were conducted by NDI. Of 1,087,567 patients identified, 34,890 (3.2%) had a POP diagnosis. Q1, the least deprived group, had the highest prevalence of POP (26.3%). Most patients with POP identified as White (57.3%) and represented approximately a third of Q1. Black patients had the lowest rate of POP (5.8%) and comprised almost half of Q4, the most deprived quartile. A total of 13,730 patients (39.4%) had a urogynecology consultation, with rates ranging from 23.6% to 26.4% (P < 0.01). Less than half (12.8%) of patients with POP underwent surgical treatment, and the relative frequencies of procedure types were similar across NDI quartiles except for obliterative procedures (P = 0.01). When controlling for age, no clinically significant difference was demonstrated. Differences in urogynecology consultation, surgical treatment, and surgical procedure type performed for prolapse across NDI quartiles were not found to be clinically significant. Our findings suggest that equitable evaluation and treatment of prolapse can occur through a membership-based integrated health care system.

Association of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status With Prolapse Management Decision.

This study identifies how neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) may affect patients' treatment decisions for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to evaluate the association of neighborhood-level SES with the decision of surgical versus conservative POP management. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with POP at a tertiary medical center between 2015 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up or poor surgical candidates were excluded. Patient characteristics, demographics, and treatment selection were abstracted from the electronic health record. Conservative management was defined as expectant, pessary, and/or pelvic floor physical therapy. Five-digit zip codes were linked to the Area Deprivation Index and used as a surrogate for neighborhood-level SES. Area Deprivation Indices were dichotomized at or below the sample median (less disadvantaged area) and above the sample median (more disadvantaged area). Logistic regression models estimated the odds of choosing surgical versus conservative management as a function of the Area Deprivation Index. A total of 459 patients met the eligibility criteria (non-Hispanic White, 88.2%). The median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 52-70 years), and the majority had stage 2 POP (65.7%). Of all patients, 59.3% had Medicare/Medicaid, 39.9% were privately insured, and 0.9% were uninsured. Furthermore, 74.7% selected surgical management, and 25.3% chose conservative management. Increasing age and higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage were significantly associated with selecting surgery (P = 0.01). Women residing in a more disadvantaged area had a 67% increased odds of choosing surgical over conservative management (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.64) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage. Residing in a more disadvantaged zip code was associated with 67% increased odds of choosing surgical versus conservative POP management.

Surgical and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Vaginal Suspension Combined with Suture Rectopexy for Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abstract Purpose Laparoscopic techniques to treat pelvic organ prolapse are gaining popularity around the globe due to their low recurrence rates and better functional results compared to perineal techniques. However, the optimum surgical procedures are not yet determined. In the current research, we suggest a novel surgical approach, laparoscopic vaginal suspension with suture rectopexy, to treat multiorgan pelvic prolapse. Methods This prospective cohort trial was conducted from March 2018 to March 2022 and comprised 35 females with multiorgan pelvic organ prolapse with obstructed defecation symptoms. A residual rectal prolapse was still present despite the manual reduction of uterine prolapse. Patients' conditions before and after the operation were monitored regarding the obstructed defecation score, sexual function, need for laxatives, anorectal manometry pressures, anorectal sensations, and recurrence. The mean follow-up duration was one year. Results Modified Longo score for obstructed defecation significantly decreased at six and twelve months after surgery. Additionally, a significant reduction was reported in the number of patients who needed laxatives at six and twelve months after surgery. Anorectal manometry pre- and post-surgery showed a significant elevation in the mean squeeze pressure and a decline in all rectal sensations. All parameters of the female sexual function scoring system increased postoperatively. No recurrence was reported during follow-up. Conclusion For multiorgan pelvic prolapse, laparoscopic vaginal suspension combined with suture rectopexy has excellent functional outcomes, minimal morbidity, and low cost.

Effect of pelvic floor status on the outcome of pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common diagnosis with an incidence in the population of up to 50%. POP causes restrictions in everyday life and reduces patients' quality of life. Therapy is either conservative in the form of physiotherapy or the use of different types of pessaries, possibly. in case of inappropriateness or failure of conservative treatment, an operative solution is chosen. Avulsion injury of the levator ani muscle (MLA) is a strong factor in the development of POP. Some patients undergo repeated surgeries for POP, negatively impacting their quality of life. Studies show that the stage of POP and avulsion injury is associated with an increased risk of recurrence after index prolapse surgery. Ultrasound diagnosis of MLA injuries might help in predicting the risk of recurrence. Assessment of pelvic floor function is crucial for the success of surgical management of POP.

Surgical management practice of pelvic organ prolapse among Ethiopian gynecologists, 2021: a descriptive study

IntroductionPelvic Organ Prolapse is the descent of one or more of the anterior vaginal wall, posterior vaginal wall, the uterus, or the apex of the vagina. Surgical intervention addresses both anatomical defect and associated symptoms. The landscape of prolapse surgery has been evolving constantly over years. Emerging evidences either support or challenge existing surgical treatment options, making urogynecology a dynamic field. In Ethiopia, the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse has transitioned from abdominal to vaginal hysterectomy, supplemented later by McCall’s culdoplasty. Disparities exist in the national uniformity of surgical approaches, linked to the establishment of Urogynecology centers in certain institutions.ObjectivesThis study was done to assess the surgical management practice of Ethiopian gynecologists on pelvic organ prolapse.MethodsA cross-sectional study encompassing all Gynecologists in Ethiopia took place between January to June 2021. Information was gathered through online Google forms crafted in English. Subsequently, the collected data underwent verification, coding, and entry into Epi info 7 before being exported to SPSS version 22 software for descriptive statistical analysis.ResultsWe reached 280 gynecologists out of the 450 practicing in the Ethiopia making 62% response rate. Anterior colporrhaphy (98.6%), vaginal hysterectomy with McCall’s cul-do-plasty (51.8%), and Posterior colporrhaphy (97.5%) were the most commonly performed surgical procedures for anterior vaginal wall prolapse, apical prolapse (uterine/cervical), and posterior vaginal wall prolapse respectively. Only 3.2% and 0.7% of the gynecologists conducted abdominal and vaginal paravaginal repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse were carried out by 32.9% and 9.3% of the gynecologists respectively. Site-specific posterior repair for posterior vaginal wall prolapse was performed only by 23.9% of the gynecologists. The main reasons mentioned not to perform paravaginal repair, sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and site-specific posterior repair were lack of skill and lack of appropriate materials.Conclusion and recommendationMost gynecologists in Ethiopian continue to perform vaginal hysterectomy and colporrhaphy procedures for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse due primarily to lack of skill and appropriate materials to perform the alternative procedures. Implementing short term training on alternative surgical treatment options of pelvic organ prolapse with provision of suitable materials and increasing the number of urogynecologists in the country in the long run holds the potential to enhance the standard of care of women with the condition.

#359 : Impact of Genitourinary Prolapse on Quality of Life and Sexual Function in Women at Their Midlife

Background and Aims: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting women during their midlife, leading to various symptoms and decreased quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess the association of POP severity with QoL and sexual function in women at their midlife, with the objective of providing valuable insights for comprehensive care and effective management of POP. Method: A cross-sectional study included 130 symptomatic GUP women aged 40-60 years from Sir Salimullah Medical College &amp; Mitford Hospital in Dhaka. Group 1 (85 women) had stage 1 GUP, while the remaining were in group 2. Face-to-face interviews and POP-Q staging were conducted, followed by statistical analysis using Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman rank correlation tests to examine the association of GUP severity with QoL and sexual function between the groups. Results: The mean age of the participants was 51.24 years (SD=5.5). The majority of the respondents were above 50 years of age (56%), and 65.38% of the study population were in group 2. One-third of the respondents (35.38%) had stage III GUP whereas only 4.62% were in stage IV. The frequency of urinary symptoms was most commonly occurring (70%) where dribbling of urine was least frequent (38%). Sexual and bowel symptoms were correlated with advanced stage of disease where urinary symptoms were not associated with GUP severity. Sexual dysfunction symptoms were positively associated with uterine descent. Regarding quality of life, all nine domains of QoL scores had positive correlation with severity of GUP. Conclusion: This study reveals the correlation between POP and urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms. Clinicians should assess these symptoms for comprehensive care, and further research is required to determine effective treatment options for women with POP.

Pelvic floor symptoms among premenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Most of the literature on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been generated from postmenopausal patients in high-income countries. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a significant proportion of patients who present for surgical management of POP are premenopausal. Little is known about the impact of POP on pelvic floor symptoms in this population. The objective was to describe pelvic floor symptoms and sexual function among premenopausal patients presenting for POP surgery in DRC. We performed a prospective cohort study of symptomatic premenopausal patients undergoing fertility-sparing POP surgery at a large referral hospital in the DRC. Pelvic floor symptoms were evaluated with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire and sexual function with the Pelvic organ prolapse/urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Data are presented as means with standard deviations or counts with percentages. A total of 107 patients were recruited between April 2019 and December 2021. All had either stage III (95.3%) or stage IV (4.7%) prolapse. Ages were 34.2 ± 6.7 years; 78.5% were married. A majority of patients experienced low abdominal pain (82.2%), heaviness or dullness (95.3%), and bulging or protrusion of the prolapse (92.5%). Almost two-thirds of patients reported no longer being sexually active, and 80% stated that they were not sexually active because of POP. Of the 37 sexually active patients (34.6%), nearly all reported significant sexual impairment because of the prolapse, with only 4 reporting no sexual impairment. This study represents one of the largest prospective series of patients with premenopausal POP. Our results highlight the severity of pelvic floor symptoms and the negative effects on sexual function among this patient population with POP.

Techniques in the Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition affecting women worldwide, significantly impacting their quality of life. Surgical management plays a vital role in addressing the associated discomfort and dysfunction. This bibliographic review explores the epidemiology, significance, theoretical framework, encompassing definition, risk factors, complications, and management of pelvic organ prolapse. The discussion delves into emerging techniques and sheds light on the future of this critical aspect of surgical practice.

Vaginal Cancer: Association with long term use of Pessary in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Vaginal cancer, rarest form of gynaecological cancer (0.6%) has been found to be associated with long term use of vaginal ring pessary, which have long been used in alternative management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) other than surgery. A through survey was done in remote areas of Cox’s bazar, refugee camp where out of 52 cases of pelvic organ prolapse, 7 cases found to use vaginal ring pessary for long and out of 7, vaginal cancer developed in 4 cases. All of them were aged women above 60 and had defaulted follow up presented with vaginal bleeding, varying discharge and pain of varying intensity. One patient had only local lesion was treated by surgical removal followed by radiotherapy. The 2 nd  one, 68 years, received neo-adjuvant therapy and died before planned surgery. The 3 rd  one, aged 79, did not come for follow up after diagnosis of vaginal cancer done and advised for definitive surgical treatment, family refused operation and she passed away after 2 years at 81 years. The 4 th  one declined further investigations and any form of treatment once diagnosed with vaginal cancer. So, all patients of pelvic organ prolapse should be informed thoroughly (both verbal and written informed consent) before inserting pessary for potential long term serious consequences where strict compliance must be ensured for subsequent regular follow up and biopsy should be mandatory for any suspicious chronic vaginal ulcers among them. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022; Vol. 37(1): 75-77

A randomized controlled study comparing the objective efficacy and safety of a novel self-inserted disposable vaginal prolapse device and existing ring pessaries.

ProVate is a novel, disposable, collapsible self-inserted vaginal device for the nonsurgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We assessed possible vaginal microflora changes and POP reduction using ProVate and a commercially available ring pessary (control). We performed post-hoc analysis of data obtained from an interventional, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, statistically powered (noninferiority), home-use, cross-over study conducted at seven sites. Safety and performance data collected for both devices were analyzed to compare objective POP reduction (employing the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System [POP-Q]), safety (assessed by the incidence of adverse events [AEs]), and the rates of certain AEs. Eighty-five women with symptomatic POP were screened; 71 were randomized, and 58 completed the study per protocol. Forty-nine (90.7%) ProVate users experienced complete prolapse reduction (stage 0), 3 (5.6%) experienced reductions to POP-Q stage 1, and 2 (3.7%%) experienced reductions to stage 2. Collectively, 52/54 (96.3%) ProVate users experienced prolapse reduction to stage 0 or 1. In all, 47/57 (82.5%) control users experienced complete prolapse reduction, while 5 (8.8%), 4 (7.0%), and 1 (1.8%) experienced reductions to stage 1, 2, and stage 3, respectively. Collectively, 52/57 (91.2%) control users experienced reductions to either stage 0 or 1. In 53/54 (98.1%) ProVate and 55/57 (96.5%) control users, there was at least 1 POP-Q stage prolapse reduction, and in 32 (91.4%) ProVate and 31 (83.8%) control users who had stage ≥3 prolapse, there were at least three POP-Q stage reductions. In total, 26/71 (36.6%) ProVate and 22/64 (34.4%) control users in the safety population experienced AEs. The incidence of device-related AEs was 17/71 (23.9%) for ProVate and 13/64 (20.3%) for the control. Most AEs were minor, mild, and anticipated. Our analysis demonstrated that ProVate and the control are highly effective in reducing POP, and both are associated with comparably low numbers of AEs. However, ProVate has the advantage of being more user-friendly, suitable for home use, and expected to allow women with POP to practice better and easier self-care.

Does adding estrogen to surgery for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in postmenopausal women have any benefits?

Does adding estrogen to surgery for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in postmenopausal women have any benefits?

Pessary management for pelvic organ prolapse: a review of clinical practice and Australian medical device regulations

Pessary management for pelvic organ prolapse: a review of clinical practice and Australian medical device regulations

Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of a woman's uterus, bladder, or rectum into the vagina. It affects 50% of women over 50 years old who have given birth to at least one child, and recognised risk factors are older age, higher number of births, and higher body mass index. This review assesses the effects of oestrogen therapy, alone or in combination with other treatments, on POP in postmenopausal women. To assess the benefits and harms of local and systemic oestrogen therapy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in postmenopausal women, and to summarise the principal findings of relevant economic evaluations. We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register (up to 20 June 2022), which includes CENTRAL, MEDLINE, two trials registers, and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles for additional studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, multi-arm RCTs, and cross-over RCTs that evaluated the effects of oestrogen therapy (alone or in combination with other treatments) versus placebo, no treatment, or other interventions in postmenopausal women with any grade of POP. Two review authors independently extracted data from the included trials using prespecified outcome measures and a piloted extraction form. The same review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of eligible trials using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Had data allowed, we would have created summary of findings tables for our main outcome measures and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We identified 14 studies including a total of 1002 women. In general, studies were at high risk of bias in terms of blinding of participants and personnel, and there were also some concerns about selective reporting. Owing to insufficient data for the outcomes of interest, we were unable to perform our planned subgroup analyses (systemic versus topical oestrogen, parous versus nulliparous women, women with versus without a uterus). No studies assessed the effects of oestrogen therapy alone versus no treatment, placebo, pelvic floor muscle training, devices such as vaginal pessaries, or surgery. However, we did identify three studies that assessed oestrogen therapy in conjunction with vaginal pessaries versus vaginal pessaries alone and 11 studies that assessed oestrogen therapy in conjunction with surgery versus surgery alone. There was insufficient evidence from RCTs to draw any solid conclusions on the benefits or harms of oestrogen therapy for managing POP symptoms in postmenopausal women. Topical oestrogen in conjunction with pessaries was associated with fewer adverse vaginal events compared with pessaries alone, and topical oestrogen in conjunction with surgery was associated with reduced postoperative urinary tract infections compared with surgery alone; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as the studies that contributed data varied substantially in their design. There is a need for larger studies on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oestrogen therapy, used alone or in conjunction with pelvic floor muscle training, vaginal pessaries, or surgery, for the management of POP. These studies should measure outcomes in the medium and long term.

Bilateral posterior Richter sacrospinous fixation with native tissue: anatomical and functional results and quality of life assessment over 10 years.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that affects 50% of women who have given birth in their lifetime. With stop of vaginal mesh sale in 2019, the sacrospinous fixation technique according to Richter with native tissue has seen its incidence tripled in 15 years. Classically, sacrospinous fixation according to Richter is performed unilaterally, however its unilateral or bilateral character is controversial. Objective of this work is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by the posterior approach with native tissue (SSB). We performed a retrospective single-center study. From March 12, 2010 to March 23, 2020, all first-time operated patients who underwent SSB in CHU Strasbourg gynecological surgery unit for symptomatic POP management were included. The main endpoint of our work is the anatomical and functional success rate at 12 and 24 months. The secondary judgment criteria of our work were based on the postoperative evaluation of patient's quality of life according to the PFDI-20 score as well as the rate of postoperative complications. 77 patients were included in our work. The anatomical success rate at 12 months is 94% and 81% at 24 months regardless of the compartment affected. The functional success rate is 94% at 12 months and 82% at 24 months. Quality of life evaluation through the PFDI-20 scale revealed a clear improvement in the symptomatology related to POP: 127/300 +/- 27.3. preoperatively and 59.8 ± 14.7 postoperatively. Bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by posterior approach with native tissue is a safe and effective surgical technique allowing a clear improvement in patients quality of life.

MP07-08 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SACROCOLPOPEXY: TRENDS AND SAFETY OF SAME-DAY DISCHARGE

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP07-08 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SACROCOLPOPEXY: TRENDS AND SAFETY OF SAME-DAY DISCHARGE Tal Cohen, Arshia Aalami Harandi, and Jason Kim Tal CohenTal Cohen More articles by this author , Arshia Aalami HarandiArshia Aalami Harandi More articles by this author , and Jason KimJason Kim More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003222.08AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) has become a preferred approach in women with pelvic organ prolapse. This study aims to evaluate trends and outcomes of same day discharge (SDD) laparoscopic or robotic SCP using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSPIQ) database. METHODS: Patients were collected from the NSQIP database between 2012-2020 with the current procedural terminology code 57280. Patients with total hospital stay of 0 days were classified as SDD and compared to patients that were discharged on post-op day 1 or 2. The primary outcomes were 30-day complications and readmission rates. Demographic data and perioperative characteristics between the two groups were compared using the appropriate t-test, Chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: A total of 17,723 SCP were included. There were 3,112 (17.6%) same day discharges. There was a significant association between SDD SCP and year of operation (p<.001), with 31.0% of SCP in 2020 discharged on the same day in contrast to 10% of SCP in 2012. SDD patients were younger (56.8 vs. 58.9 years, p<.001), and had lower prevalence of diabetes (8.2% vs. 9.9%, p<.01) and hypertension requiring medications (30.9% vs. 36.9%, p<.001). SDD SCP were more frequently performed by gynecologists than urologists (94.4% vs. 89.5%, p<.001) and had lower operative time (165.5 vs. 187.6 minutes, p<.001). There were fewer cases of readmissions following SDD (1.5% vs. 2.5%, p<.01). Post-operatively, SDD cases were associated with more superficial surgical site infections (1.5% vs. 0.8%, p<.001), but significantly fewer cases of class III-IV complications (0.7% vs. 1.2%, p<.05, Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a steady rise in SDD after minimally invasive SCP with no significant association of increased risk for serious complications. With further patient education on wound care, SDD after minimally invasive SCP may be a safe and less costly alternative in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e87 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Tal Cohen More articles by this author Arshia Aalami Harandi More articles by this author Jason Kim More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

MP07-01 MESH-FREE MANAGEMENT OF APICAL PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF VAGINAL SACROSPINOUS FIXATION V ROBOTIC UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP07-01 MESH-FREE MANAGEMENT OF APICAL PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF VAGINAL SACROSPINOUS FIXATION V ROBOTIC UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION Sandra Elmer, Omar Salehi, Niranjan Sathianathen, Jodie McDonald, Nathan Lawrentschuk, and Caroline Dowling Sandra ElmerSandra Elmer More articles by this author , Omar SalehiOmar Salehi More articles by this author , Niranjan SathianathenNiranjan Sathianathen More articles by this author , Jodie McDonaldJodie McDonald More articles by this author , Nathan LawrentschukNathan Lawrentschuk More articles by this author , and Caroline DowlingCaroline Dowling More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003222.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly impacts quality of life for many women. Mesh sacral colpopexy (SCP) has a recurrence rate up to 23%, and vaginal procedures to correct apical POP up to 41%. After the FDA warnings and restrictions of transvaginal mesh, increasing concerns regarding mesh have resulted in a need for mesh-free alternatives. This study compares 2 mesh-free techniques, robotic/laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (RUSL) and vaginal sacrospinous fixation (SSF) in managing apical POP. METHODS: A prospective clinical audit of 115 women with apical POP who underwent RUSL (n=61) or SSF (n=54) by a single surgeon. Demographic data included age, parity, and previous POP surgery. A pre-operative (preop) pelvic floor (PF) questionnaire was used to identify prevalence of bladder, bowel and vaginal symptoms. POP-Q was recorded at surgery and at post-operative (postop) reviews. The absolute change in POP-Q scores were recorded as objective measures of PF support. Other postop metrics used include symptomatic vaginal bulge, need for repeat POP surgery (reop) and subjective improvement in symptoms based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Postop adverse events (AE) were recorded (Clavien Dindo grading scale). Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson’s Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare groups, and univariate analysis to predict factors for success/reop. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar (Table 1). Mean time from surgery was 736 (RUSL) and 565 days (SSF). Difference in postop C points was not significant (RUSL: median -8 (IQR 2), SSF: median -7cm (IQR 2), p=0.279). Procedure success rates (postop C point <0) were not different (RUSL 90.2%, SSF 92.5%, p=0.92). Reop rates for apical recurrence were SSF 1.9%, RUSL 6.6%, p=0.21; univariate odds ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.03 to 2.43]. Univariate analysis for reop found that age, parity and surgery type were not predictors of reoperation (p=0.26, p=0.92, p=0.78). The most common postop AE was urinary tract infection (RUSL 10.2%, SSF 10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: RUSL and SSF are safe and effective mesh-free techniques for management of apical POP based on objective improvements in POP-Q score and PROMs. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e84 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sandra Elmer More articles by this author Omar Salehi More articles by this author Niranjan Sathianathen More articles by this author Jodie McDonald More articles by this author Nathan Lawrentschuk More articles by this author Caroline Dowling More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse and surgery influence on their complaints.

Sexual health is an essential component of women's wellbeing. Women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) often suffer from sexual dysfunction. The current review focuses on the impact of POP as well as surgical POP repair on sexual function. A variety of techniques are discussed in relation to this issue, including native tissue repair (NTR), transvaginal mesh (TVM) and sacrocolpopexy (SCP). The majority of studies utilise validated questionnaires to assess sexual function in women pre- and post-POP repair and FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) and PISQ-IR (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA revised) are among the most commonly used. According to the available data, surgical management of POP usually results in improved or unchanged scores in sexual function, regardless of the type of procedure used. SCP appears to be the preferred surgical management for women with apical vaginal prolapse that minimises the risk of dyspareunia as compared to vaginal techniques.

Nonoperative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined as the descent of one or more of the anterior, posterior, or apical vagina. It is a common condition, with up to 50% of women having prolapse on examination in their lifetimes. This article provides an overview of the evaluation and discussion of nonoperative management of POP for the obstetrician-gynecologist (ob-gyn), with consideration of recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the International Urogynecological Association. The initial evaluation of POP requires a history documenting whether the patient is experiencing symptoms and what they are, and discovery of which symptoms they believe are attributable to prolapse. Examination determines the vaginal compartment(s) and to what degree prolapse exists. In general, only patients who have symptomatic prolapse or medical indication should be offered treatment. Although surgical options exist, all patients who are symptomatic and desire treatment should be offered nonsurgical treatment first, including pelvic floor physical therapy or a pessary trial. Appropriateness, expectations, complications, and counseling points are reviewed. Educational opportunities between the patient and the ob-gyn include disentangling common beliefs that the bladder is dropping or that concomitant urinary or bowel symptoms are necessarily caused by prolapse. Improving patient education can lead to a better understanding of their condition and better alignment of treatment goals and expectations.